Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Juncheng Shang vs Daniil Medvedev Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Shang vs Medvedev analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On This Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Juncheng Shang vs Daniil Medvedev Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Shang 0 - 0 Medvedev
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Shang has won 52.85% of points on their second serve, while Medvedev has won 50.04%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Shang, in recent form, has won 50.61% of their opponent's second serve points, while Medvedev has won 53.42%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.11% and 32.52% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Shang has saved 63.6% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Medvedev has saved 61.07% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Shang has won 60% of matches played (W/L 39/ 26), with Medvedev winning 73.97% (W/L 54/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Shang has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 64% (W/L 14/ 8), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 7/ 7). Medvedev has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 76% (W/L 237/ 74), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 85/ 47).
- Player level: In the last year, Shang has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 65.22% of matches (W/L 15/ 8), where as Medvedev has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 18/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Shang has played against opponents with an average rank of 196.14 while Medvedev has played against players with an average rank of 104.66.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Shang has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Medvedev has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Shang has converted 35.71% of breakpoint opportunities, and Medvedev has converted 44.44% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
91
Rank
89
High
19
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
5
Rank
1
High
28
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
Form
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
62% (111-67)
Career Total W/L
72% (518-206)
62% (24-15)
YTD W/L
76% (29-9)
$783,570
Career Prize Money
$29,516,910
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Juncheng Shang vs Daniil Medvedev For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Shang VS Medvedev
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Juncheng Shang | Daniil Medvedev |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 62% (24/15) | 76% (29/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (55/45) | 67% (72/35) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (511/491) | 54% (568/483) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 64% (9/5) | 82% (18/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 53% (8/7) | 67% (8/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 70% (7/3) | 75% (3/1) |
| Aces pg | 0.29 | 0.47 |
| Aces Total | 144 | 244 |
| DFs per game | 0.15 | 0.3 |
| DFs Total | 75 | 153 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:5:55 | 2:8:59 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 163.18 | 119.29 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (2057/3212) | 62% (2038/3299) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (1404/2057) | 73% (1485/2038) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 54% (618/1155) | 50% (631/1261) |
| BPs Won% Total | 36% (112/312) | 44% (144/324) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (1207/3219) | 40% (1361/3396) |
| Slam W/L | 60% (3/2) | 85% (11/2) |
| Masters W/L | 55% (6/5) | 74% (14/5) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 69% (9/4) | 67% (4/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 60% (6/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (21/35) | 76% (19/25) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 75% (3/4) | 83% (10/12) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 55% (11/20) | 76% (13/17) |
| Deciding Set W% | 75% (12/16) | 80% (8/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 84% (19/16) | 91% (23/21) |
| 1st set W, L | 16% (19/3) | 9% (23/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 40% (20/8) | 53% (15/8) |
Juncheng Shang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Juncheng Shang
Player
Cristian Garin
66%
(
63 of
95)
1st Serve %
63%
(
58 of
92)
13
Aces
14
2
Double Faults
2
87%
(
55 of
63)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
45 of
58)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
22%
(
21 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
92)
105
Total Points Won
82
|
7-5 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Taylor Fritz
Player
Juncheng Shang
73%
(
54 of
74)
1st Serve %
67%
(
59 of
88)
20
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
93%
(
50 of
54)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
43 of
59)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
0%
(
0 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
18%
(
13 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
25 of
88)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
60%
(
56 of
93)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
8
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
39 of
52)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
30 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
26 of
81)
89
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
74%
(
73 of
99)
1st Serve %
73%
(
71 of
97)
11
Aces
14
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
59 of
71)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
30 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
25 of
97)
94
Total Points Won
102
|
7-5 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Giles Hussey
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
42%
(
32 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Oscar Otte
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
61 of
96)
5
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
22 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
96)
94
Total Points Won
79
|
6-7(3) 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Juncheng Shang
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
70%
(
50 of
71)
7
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
2
84%
(
42 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
83
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Alex Bolt
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
7
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
64
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Tomas Barrios Vera
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
1
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
6-0 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Billy Harris
Player
Juncheng Shang
80%
(
53 of
66)
1st Serve %
68%
(
53 of
78)
9
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
43 of
53)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
40 of
53)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
15 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
view more
Daniil Medvedev Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Alexandre Muller
64%
(
95 of
148)
1st Serve %
64%
(
104 of
162)
14
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
4
75%
(
71 of
95)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
74 of
104)
60%
(
32 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
30%
(
45 of
148)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
62 of
162)
165
Total Points Won
145
|
6-7(3) 7-6(4) 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Aleksandar Kovacevic
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
63%
(
53 of
84)
16
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
4
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
38 of
53)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
22 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
84)
94
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zhizhen Zhang
Player
Daniil Medvedev
67%
(
71 of
106)
1st Serve %
63%
(
58 of
92)
12
Aces
13
4
Double Faults
5
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
47 of
58)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
38 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
30 of
92)
98
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 2-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Nuno Borges
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve %
72%
(
49 of
68)
9
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
23 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Daniil Medvedev
54%
(
55 of
101)
1st Serve %
57%
(
65 of
114)
7
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
40 of
65)
57%
(
26 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
33%
(
33 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
52 of
114)
120
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 6-2 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Tomas Machac
62%
(
93 of
149)
1st Serve %
63%
(
86 of
136)
14
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
2
66%
(
61 of
93)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
52 of
86)
50%
(
28 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
40%
(
60 of
149)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
55 of
136)
144
Total Points Won
141
|
7-6(4) 7-5 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
25%
(
1 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
50
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Dominik Koepfer
68%
(
73 of
108)
1st Serve %
65%
(
88 of
135)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
56 of
73)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
50 of
88)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
34%
(
37 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
63 of
135)
134
Total Points Won
109
|
6-3 6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Daniil Medvedev
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
45%
(
19 of
42)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Jack Draper
50%
(
35 of
70)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
66)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Shang Vs Medvedev Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Shang are available here and Medvedev photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Juncheng Shang
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
